| Type | Judging |
|---|---|
| Organisation | Major League Hacking (MLH) |
| Field | Software engineers |
| Open to | Global and United States |
| Cost | Free to apply. No fee appears on the programme's own pages; this is an absence of a fee rather than a quoted statement. |
| Cycle | Rolling |
| Deadline | Continuous per event |
| Selection | Not stated |
| Evidence | Verification date not recorded. |
What this is
MLH member-hackathon judge & mentor roles (recruiting playbook) is a judging run by Major League Hacking (MLH). It is aimed at software engineers. Open to global and united states. Free to apply. No fee appears on the programme's own pages; this is an absence of a fee rather than a quoted statement.
Who it is for
Tech experts and community members who can judge, mentor and speak at MLH-sanctioned college hackathons; organizers recruit a variety of tech experts per event.
Eligibility
No stated formal bar; each member-event organizer recruits its own judges (guide targets organizers on finding/judging criteria).
How you apply
unknown
When it closes
Rolling: applications are accepted continuously, or per event, rather than in one window.
Source note: confidence=0.9 next_occurrence=Continuous per event
How competitive it is
On selectivity, the source says: Per-event; no central selective process
Getting in: open to approach.
Roughly 2 hours to prepare an application.
What it produces
If you take part, the documentation this tends to generate:
Potential profile relevance
The activity type each pathway's published criteria name, and nothing more than that. This is a description of an activity, not an assessment of eligibility, and it is not legal advice — see the disclosures.
| Pathway | Activity type | Why it is listed |
|---|---|---|
| O-1A | Judging the work of others | This opportunity involves judging. |
| EB-1A | Judging the work of others | This opportunity involves judging. |
| EB-2 NIW | Judging the work of others | This opportunity involves judging. |